21h ago

Published paper finds similar pedestrian detection rates across skin tones

0

Kelsey Piper reviewed a claim tracing from The Atlantic through a Union of Concerned Scientists report to a 2023 preprint that asserted a 7.52 percent higher miss rate for dark-skinned pedestrians. The version published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology reported average miss rates of 30.15 percent for light-skinned individuals and 29.71 percent for dark-skinned individuals. The tested systems were not commercial deployments. Leading operators such as Waymo rely on lidar and imaging radar that detect presence independent of skin tone.

Original post

Careful reporting by Kelsey here. Atlantic should correct and apologize. Waymo uses lidar. It *literally* does not see race.

All of this is entirely irrelevant to the safety of Waymo. Waymo does not primarily do pedestrian detection through normal cameras and machine learning algorithms that interpret what the cameras are seeing. It has cameras,
but it also builds a complete picture of its surroundings with lidar (bouncing a laser around) and imaging radar (from emitting radio waves).
Both of those will obviously be race-agnostic, though children will still be harder to see than adults as they take up less space.?
10:31 AM · May 13, 2026 View on X
Reposted by

New “datacenters consume all the world’s water” just dropped

Kelsey Piper@KelseyTuoc

Are autonomous vehicles (self-driving cars) “less able to detect people of color”? That’s what I read in The Atlantic this weekend, in Xochitl Gonzalez’s “People Who Don’t Like People Are Making All of Our Decisions.” It appears to be entirely false.

4:48 PM · May 13, 2026 · 264.5K Views
4:29 AM · May 14, 2026 · 11.4K Views